NetWorks: Oxygen therapy, electronic consent, diagnosing ILD
Oxygen therapy in patients with COPD with moderate desaturation
Two landmark trials from the early 1980s demonstrated survival benefit with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients with COPD with severe resting hypoxemia [Sao2 less than 89%; (Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93[3]:391) or Pao2 40-60 mm Hg and cor pulmonale (Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party. Lancet. 1981;1[8222]:681).
The potential benefits of LTOT in COPD with mild-moderate hypoxemia have not been clearly established. The LOTT trial (The Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375[17]:1617), a recent multicenter randomized study, attempted to answer this question. They studied 738 stable patients with COPD with mild to moderate resting desaturation (Spo2 89%-93%) or exercise-induced moderate desaturation (Spo2 greater than or equal to 80% for greater than or equal to 5 minutes and Spo2 less than 90% for greater than or equal to 10 seconds during 6- minute walk test). After a median follow-up of 18.4 months, LTOT did not demonstrate a decrease in the time to death or first hospitalization and did not show improvement in quality of life or functional status. Notable adverse events from oxygen included 23 instances of tripping over equipment, with two patients requiring hospitalization and six fires with one patient hospitalized for burns.
A Cochrane meta-analysis, which did not include LOTT data, revealed that oxygen relieved breathlessness during acute exercise in mildly-moderately hypoxemic patients with COPD, but there was insufficient evidence of benefit in daily life or in health-related quality of life (Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD006429).
Whether or not to continue prescribing oxygen to patients with moderate desaturation remains a controversial issue. A trial of oxygen may be warranted in those who are already on maximal evidence-based therapy for COPD and still complain of severe breathlessness (Ekstrom M; N Engl J Med. 2016;375[17]:1683). Conversely, a patient with COPD and moderate desaturation who resists being placed on supplemental oxygen, can be reassured that this is a reasonable course based on current evidence (Baliksoon R. COPD. 2017;4:71).
Navitha Ramesh, MD, MBBS
Fellow-in-Training Steering Committee Member
Allen Blaivas, DO, FCCP
Steering Committee Member
Informed consent: Do we need to change our practice?
Informed consent is the keystone of clinical research and helps respect and protect the rights of the participants/subjects. While the informed consent process has been standardized, some challenges still remain, such as pieces of information that should be disclosed, how to disclose information and document understanding of participants, and how detailed that disclosure should be (Grady C. N Engl J Med. 2015;372[9]:855). Digital technology can and has been used to improve the process of obtaining informed consent. Smartphones now comprise 75% of all mobile phones sold worldwide. They are being used to reach a larger and diverse population to conduct trials.
Substituting long and complex written forms with electronic consent (e-consent), however, has issues. Few people read through online agreements before clicking “agree,” which may lead to participants consenting without a clear understanding of what they are consenting to. On the other hand, it is also possible to use e-consent to improve comprehension by including videos and graphics. Interactive quizzes can assess the understanding of the participants, and embedded links to audios or videos can further enhance the grasp of information. With e-consents, queries from participants can be answered via phone call or email, etc. When e-consent is obtained remotely, the identity can be confirmed by electronic signatures, username, password, or biometrics.
E-consent has advantages, can be done remotely, no paper is needed, etc. It has potential disadvantages like being costly, videos can add time to the process, and multicenter international trials can be difficult (Grady C, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376[20]:e43). Studying e-consents to identify gaps in communication between the researcher and the participant in the digitalized world may help improve the process and allow research to proceed with better understanding of the risks and benefits of involvement in clinical research.
Moshsin Ijaz, MD, FCCP
Steering Committee Member
Early ID and treatment in sepsis
PRISM, the latest meta-analysis of three multicenter trials (ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMISe) found no difference in mortality with early goal-directed therapy vs usual care (N Engl J Med. 2017; 376[23]:2223). These clinical trials promoted early recognition of sepsis and prompt delivery of IV fluids and antimicrobial agents before randomization. It seems that early identification and treatment of sepsis and the rapid administration of antibiotics (following the timing recommended for sepsis bundle protocols) are the most effective interventions in sepsis (Seymour WS, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376[23]:2235). Other interventions over the past decade designed to reduce mortality associated with sepsis have been unsuccessful.
