Corpora callosa of young football players could be at risk
Younger players are not immune to the brain damage that can come with playing football, National Public Radio says, quoting a grim report from the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America.
The technique of magnetic resonance imaging, which essentially records a video of brain structure and function in real time, was used to scan the brains of 26 boys aged an average of 12 years before and after a season of football. The findings were compared with the brain scans of 26 other boys of similar age who were not football players, according to NPR.
Damage to the region that connects the two halves of the brain was evident in a majority of the football players but not in their control counterparts. in the shape of the corpus callosum. When these changes come at a time in life when the brain is developing, the results can be lifetime consequences on thought, behavior, and emotion.
“You have to understand that the NFL players were also most likely once collegiate players; they were also high school players and they were also probably youth players,” says radiologist Christopher T. Whitlow, MD, PhD, of Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, N.C., and a coauthor of the new findings, in the interview. “To us, it’s more than a question about concussions, it’s a question about long-term cumulative exposure.
“We don’t know what [the results] mean … do these changes persist over time? Do they accumulate with multiple seasons? And then No. 3, probably the most important: Do they have any relevance to long-term health?”
Average can be just fine
The need to excel is drilled into many people from childhood. Hard work is a virtue, but the pressure to shine can have disastrous consequences. In South Korea, for example, academic pressure is a major cause of suicide in youth.
A recent TED Women conference held in Palm Springs, Calif., provided some reassurance for those in the “forgotten middle” – those who were adequate but not stellar students, and who do their work diligently but not outstandingly.
“Those at the top get noticed and those at the bottom get extra help but no one really thinks about the kids in the middle who make up the majority,” says Danielle R. Moss Lee, EdD, a social activist and chief of the New York Civil Liberties Union, who spoke at the conference. These folks can be valuable contributors but are often overlooked. As a result, when it comes to excelling, they “check out.”
“We have to create different ways to harness their potential. I didn’t appreciate how average I was until I was a college student and I bumped into a science teacher and he couldn’t believe what college I was attending,” Dr. Lee says.
Sometimes it takes a push from a loved one to spur action. In Dr. Lee’s case, she says she was happy being an average student. Her mother’s search for extracurricular activities led her to discover writing and set her on a path to personal and professional accomplishment.
Dr. Lee’s message was that “the middle isn’t a permanent location.”
Others experts see the situation differently. “Most psychological traits are evenly distributed, meaning that a significant proportion of the population will have average intelligence and leadership potential,” says Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, PhD, of University College London, in an interview with BBC News.
“The world’s progress depends on those who stand out via their exceptional and innovative contributions, but these individuals are part of the top 1% in their field, combining truly unconventional levels of talent, work ethic, and focus,” Dr. Chamorro-Premuzic says. “For the remaining 99% of us, the acceptance that our talents and motivation are much more conventional, and unlikely to result in world-changing accomplishments, would reflect a healthier, more rational self-concept than illusions of grandiosity or fantasized talent.”
