Combined Anterior-Posterior Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
We conducted a study to evaluate the operative details, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes associated with combined anterior-posterior decompression and fusion (CAPDF) for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 21 patients who underwent CAPDF at our institution. Pertinent information, including demographics, surgery indication, perioperative complications, operative time, levels fused (and number of levels fused) anteriorly and posteriorly, estimated blood loss, and length of stay, was gathered. Outpatient follow-up data were available for 20 of the 21 patients, and postoperative neurologic status was evaluated with Nurick grades as well as by subjective means. Mean age was 62.1 years (range, 44-79 years). Of the 21 patients, 9 were female, and 12 were male. Before surgery, all patients had a diagnosis of CSM of varying degree. Mean number of levels fused was 2 (range, 1-3) anteriorly and 3 (range, 1-4) posteriorly. Mean operative time, which included patient repositioning, was 4 hours 55 minutes (range, 3:04-6:22). Mean estimated blood loss was 131 mL (range, 55-278 mL), and mean length of stay was 5 days (range, 2-10 days). The most commonly encountered complication was dysphagia (28.6%, 6/21). Neither neurologic instability nor mortality was observed after surgery. Neurologic status was subjectively improved for 19 patients and unimproved for 1 patient; no patient’s neurologic status was worse. Mean Nurick grade was 1.9 before surgery and 1.1 after surgery (mean difference, 0.80; P < .001), at a mean follow-up of 96 days (range, 51-149 days). When indicated, CAPDF is an efficient and effective treatment for CSM. This study found the procedure to be associated with minor complications, no new neurologic deficits, and high levels of neurologic improvement. The positive short-term outcomes and low rate of long-term complications in our study, combined with data from previous comparative studies, suggest that same-day surgery is superior to staged surgery.
Take-Home Points
- Surgical intervention for cervical spondylosis and radiculopathy classically involves either an anterior or posterior approach for adequate decompression of the spinal cord and associated nerve roots.
- Combined anterior-posterior surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a relatively new technique that has previously been used for disorders of the thoracolumbar spine.
- Combined anterior-posterior cervical decompression and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy is associated with minor complications and excellent neurologic outcomes.
- Combined surgery can either be performed in a single day or in a staged manner, with current literature showing that same-day surgery is superior with respect to estimated blood loss and length of stay.
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative disease characterized by progressive compression of the spinal cord. CSM has been found to be the most common cause of spinal impairment as well as the most frequently acquired cause of spinal dysfunction in people over 55 years of age.1,2 If left untreated, this condition can reduce manual dexterity and cause gait disturbances, dysesthesias, and weakness in the extremities. When conservative treatments fail, surgical intervention often becomes the preferred course of action for CSM and/or myeloradiculopathy.
The surgical approach for CSM and other advanced cervical spine (CS) deformities varies and is often a source of debate. Being a relatively safe and effective procedure, anterior decompression with fusion is optimal in treating discogenic lesions causing myelopathy but is less effective in multilevel disease.3,4 When pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and hardware failure are of concern, posterior decompressive laminectomy with instrumentation is a promising option.5 However, this method is less effective in restoring lordosis and can increase the risk for later clinical deterioration.6 There is a select subset of patients for whom a combined anterior-posterior approach is ideal.7-9In cases in which a combined anterior-posterior approach is identified as the best treatment option, whether to perform the operation in a sequential or staged manner must be decided, and this question is another source of debate. Single-day surgery is sometimes anecdotally criticized as posing a greater risk to the patient. On the other hand, some comparative studies have shown no statistically significant difference in major complication rates between the 2 options.10,11 More descriptive studies of combined anterior-posterior decompression and fusion (CAPDF) are needed to explore the efficacy of the procedure. In this article, we describe a study we conducted to characterize the operative data, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes associated with CAPDF for the treatment of CSM in a select group of patients.
Methods
After receiving Institutional Review Board approval for this study (formal consent was not required), we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 21 patients who underwent CAPDF for CSM at our institution. All patients underwent surgery between February 2010 and March 2015. Criteria for inclusion in the study included same-day CAPDF for CSM. Staged procedures were excluded, as were combined procedures for the treatment of other diseases (eg, malignancies). All patients were operated on by the same primary surgeon (Dr. Davis) and co-surgeon (Dr. Labiak). The 1 patient who was lost to follow-up was excluded from the postoperative outcome analysis.
We reviewed the patients’ medical records for surgical consultations, operative reports, intraoperative reports, progress notes, and postoperative office visit reports. Demographic information included age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative risk factors, such as diabetes and tobacco use. All patients had been diagnosed with myelopathy. Clinical data included previous history of CS surgery, levels fused (and number of levels fused) anteriorly and posteriorly, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), and perioperative complications. Short-term (3-month follow-up) neurologic improvement was determined both objectively, with the Nurick grading system,12 and subjectively, with determination of patient quality of life before and after surgery and with neurologic examination.
Operative Technique: Anterior Approach
All operations were performed with continuous somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of both upper and lower extremities. Each patient, positioned supine with the head in a neutral position, underwent standard endotracheal intubation. Intubation was followed by a transverse incision and dissection down to the deep cervical fascia with maintenance of the carotid sheath laterally and tracheoesophageal complex medially. Interspaces were identified and later were confirmed with lateral radiographs. Discectomy, osteophytectomy, and removal of hypertrophied or calcified ligament were then performed until decompression was satisfactory. Corpectomies were not performed. Polyetheretherketone interbody spacers (Stryker) were used with autograft harvested from vertebral body resection. Low-profile screw-plate systems were placed. After completion of the anterior procedure, the patient was placed prone, with the head fixed in a Mayfield clamping device in neutral position and with all pressure points carefully padded.
