A cheaper, faster way to resolve chronic cough
“Presumed diagnosis” strategy offers early treatment, a cost savings, and >90% treatment response.
- When evaluating chronic cough, consider a trial of therapy aimed at the most likely presumptive diagnosis for your locality.
- In developing algorithms such as ours, take into account your experiences, patient characteristics, and the available medical equipment.
At the insistence of her family, a woman comes to you complaining of a cough that has lasted several weeks. Many experts would urge a thorough diagnostic investigation, justifying this action with a presumed shorter course of treatment. But is an involved work-up really necessary? Would a quicker, less expensive approach serve the patient just as well? We designed our study to answer these questions.
“Test all, then treat” is expensive
In the management of patients with chronic cough, most algorithms have advocated the approach of “test all, then treat.”1-6 This is an expensive approach and one that delays relief for the patient, though a confirmative diagnosis may decrease the overall duration of treatment. In most cases, however, this approach may be unnecessary. And because few of the underlying disorders are acutely debilitating or rapidly progressive, even misdiagnosis and resultant inappropriate treatment pose little risk to patients.
The less common approach is a sequence of trial-and-error treatments based on a presumptive hierarchy of possible diagnoses.6 The advantage with this strategy is a 3-to 5-fold cost savings.6 And we suspected that the associated length of treatment would be acceptable.
We proposed that the management of patients with chronic cough begin with a presumptive diagnosis, thus simplifying the initial evaluation, keeping costs low, and offering earlier treatment.
We developed an algorithm for the treatment of patients with chronic cough that relies on minimal diagnostic investigations, regardless of the confirmed diagnosis. We evaluated our approach from the perspectives of the presumptive diagnosis and the therapeutic response period.
Methods
Treatment algorithm reflects experience and local resources
Initially, we designed the algorithm to follow findings in the literature on the treatment of patients with chronic cough. We then simplified and modified the algorithm to reflect the experiences of doctors from the pulmonology clinic in our hospital, and to take into account local patient characteristics and available medical equipment and resources.
For this study, we defined chronic cough as a one that lasts more than 4 weeks. (This definition can vary, depending on the source you consult.1) the patients we enrolled had no abnormalities detected on auscultation, chest radiography, or CBC.
Chronic cough can be managed successfully by accurate treatment of the cause, and most specialists report high success rates in treating it.2-4 The 3 most common causes of chronic cough are 1) postnasal drip, 2) asthma, and 3) gastroesophageal reflux.5
Subjects were otherwise healthy
Between January 1 and December 31, 2005, at the internal medicine clinic of Cheju National University Hospital, we enrolled 378 patients whose chief complaint was cough persisting for more than 4 weeks and who had no abnormalities detected on auscultation by a physician, chest radiography (posterior–anterior view and left lateral view), or complete blood cell counts. Each patient had a complete blood count to detect anemia, hematologic disorders, or inflammatory conditions. Current users of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were excluded.
All of the patients we enrolled were adults living in Jeju, Korea, and the mean age was 51 years. One hundred eighty-six (49%) were men. The median reported cough duration was 2 months (range, 1–36 months) (TABLE 1).
We instructed the patients on our algorithmic approach to treating chronic cough and encouraged them to follow the algorithm through to telephone notification of the next visit.
TABLE 1
Characteristics of the 378 enrolled patients
| Men/women | 186/192 (49/51%) |
| Age, years | 51.2±16.12 |
| Cough duration in months, median (range) | 2 (1–36) |
How we determined treatment outcomes
Patients graded their cough severity subjectively at each visit using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 (no cough at all) to 10 (cough severity same as that remembered during first visit to the clinic). We recorded their reports on a questionnaire.
Successful responders were patients who reported a subjective grade of cough severity less than 3. Partial responders and nonresponders were defined, respectively, as those reporting VAS scores from 3 to 6 and more than 6.
We defined the response period as the number of days from enrollment until the next visit in which the patient first reported a VAS score of cough severity less than 3.
Algorithm: Addressing the 3 most common causes of chronic cough